For Immediate Release
Oct 20, 2010
EDMONTON — Environmental groups are challenging a new oilsands project application that threatens wildlife habitat, is rife with errors and could leave Canadians facing roughly $3 billion in liability.
The Oil Sands Environmental Coalition, represented by Ecojustice, opposes the approval of Total E&P Canada’s Joslyn North Mine and is arguing for a full assessment of the project’s cumulative impacts on wildlife, fish and northern forests, as required by law.
Today the coalition’s expert panel, which includes world-renowned climate scientist Dr. James Hansen, will address wildlife impacts; undemonstrated tailings reclamation and reclamation liabilities for Canadians that could exceed $12 billion; and mistakes in Total’s application that make its assessment inadequate.
Dr. Hansen will speak on the consequences of Joslyn North’s contribution of global warming emissions. The project will significantly increase Alberta and Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions.
No greenhouse gas reduction plan exists for Canada. “Indeed, it is implausible that Canada can meet any emissions scenario consistent with stabilizing climate if the tar sands development proceeds,” said Dr. Hansen.
“We will present evidence that demonstrates significant declines in wildlife populations,” said Simon Dyer, oil sands director of Pembina Institute. “The panel must reject this project until Albertans can be assured wildlife habitat is being protected.”
“The assessment of the impacts of oil sands mining is flawed. It fails to take into account two known, disclosed oil sands mines, the additional effects of forest fires and logging, and already declining wildlife populations,” said Karin Buss, Ecojustice counsel. “It is an unreliable assessment that does not provide essential information.”