The Fraser Surrey Docks coal project is dead, following a years-long Ecojustice legal challenge and the sustained opposition from determined, grassroots community organizations.
If built, the Fraser Surrey Docks project would have seen up to four million tonnes of thermal coal carried by open-car rail from Wyoming’s Powder River Basin through Vancouver’s Lower Mainland each year, ultimately bound for export to foreign markets. When burned in overseas facilities, the coal shipped through the project would have contributed nearly seven million tonnes of CO2 emissions each year to the grave threat of manmade climate change.
Fortunately, the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority axed the permit for the facility in January 2019.
Canada’s coal exports: Concerned citizens fight back
The decision to cancel the permit came midway through an Ecojustice appeal of a Federal Court decision that could have allowed the new coal transfer facility to go ahead. In the absence of a permit, however, the Federal Court of Appeal declared Ecojustice’s case moot on April 18, 2019, officially ending the years-long legal fight against the project.
Ecojustice’s clients, Communities and Coal and local residents Paula Williams and Christine Dujmovich, first launched their legal fight against the project back in 2014 because they had major concerns about the project’s human health and climate impacts.
Health experts have linked exposure to coal dust to respiratory illnesses. Diesel particulate matter emitted by trains carrying coal is also associated with pulmonary inflammation, asthma, heart attacks and cancer risk.
Unfortunately, in declaring the case moot, the court did not weigh and decide on important arguments that Ecojustice brought forward.
Ecojustice lawyers had argued that conduct of the Port and its officers gave rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias when it greenlighted the coal project — in part because the port’s employee bonus scheme offered significant financial incentives for executives to move the project forward despite concerns from local residents.
A ruling could have clarified whether or not a project can go ahead when the people charged with approving it are or appear to be biased. Without a ruling in this case, settling that question will have to wait for another day.
Why did Ecojustice get involved?
As Canada’s largest environmental law charity, it was important to Ecojustice to help its clients go to court and fight to stop this dirty coal project in its tracks.
With doors firmly shut on coal export facilities in Washington State and Oregon, the need to find an export route along the west coast has prompted American companies to look north for ways to get their product to foreign markets. If built, the Fraser Surrey Docks coal facility would have resulted in the transport of one of the dirtiest fossil fuels on the planet right through neighbourhoods in British Columbia’s Lower Mainland.
Ecojustice’s clients didn’t want to see their communities become conduits for dirty coal. They also deserved a fair and impartial regulatory process for decisions that impact their communities.
Importantly, Ecojustice represented a community group and local residents in this case — clients that might not otherwise have had access to legal representation able to take on such a long and complicated case and appeal.
What does this victory mean?
The death of the Fraser Surrey Docks coal project is a testament to what community members can achieve when they stand up and say no to dirty U.S. coal.
While the court’s decision to rule the case moot leaves unanswered questions around bias, or appearance of bias, in public authority decision making, this on the ground win is worth celebrating.
The Port’s decision to axe the project permit was a fatal blow to an extremely controversial project that faced community-led opposition every step of the way. That is a victory for the climate and for the local communities who have spent years tirelessly fighting this project.