Ecojustice Blog – Climate change Posted on March 21, 2013 (updated: February 17, 2015)

Canada’s Environmental Commissioner Confirms Our Analysis of Offshore Oil Spill Liability

Will AmosLawyer

This morning, Canada’s Environmental Commissioner warned of major shortcomings in the federal government’s regulation of offshore oil exploration, a problem I pointed out in a 2010 Globe and Mail op-ed, entitled “If there’s an oil spill, who’s at risk? Canadian taxpayers.”

As I said back then, the important questions are, “how much would it cost to clean up an oil spill off Canada’s coastlines and, more importantly, who pays?”

The major problem, as reported by Shawn McCarthy in today’s Globe and Mail, is that oil companies “enjoy a a cap on their liability of $40 million in the North and $30 million off the East Coast unless negligence is proven” (Read the story here). The damages in British Petroleum’s 2010 spill in the Gulf of Mexico are estimated at $40 billion — 1,000 times the Canadian liability cap.

Here’s what we think
Canadian taxpayers’ exposure to the proven financial risks of ecological catastrophe demands a comprehensive and independent review of these industry-friendly rules.

Oil companies should face unlimited absolute liability for spills, in accordance with the polluter pays principle;
Phasing out our heavy reliance on fossil fuels, instead of pursuing ever more remote and difficult-to-bring-to-market reserves is the best way to avoid catastrophic oil spills.

Build the case for a better earth

Thanks to the support of people like you, Ecojustice goes to court to protect what we value most — the air, land and water that sustains all life. Make your gift today and support bold litigation for a brighter environmental future.

Join our newsletter

Get updates on the most pressing environmental issues delivered straight to your inbox.

Join our online community

Follow us on social media

60.5K

Likes


32.5K

Followers


4K

Followers